• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    About 22 years ago or so, after not taking psilocybe mushrooms for a couple years, fasting for 24 hours, I took an uncounted tens of grams of dried, fine-powdered, strong psilocybe semilanceata, hot, in just lemon juice, and chugged that pint of thick mushroom super-lemony brew down as fast as i could. It started coming on FAST and STRONG. Ran the 3 strides to the bathroom sink with need to purge, which didn’t last long nor purge much of it… clinging to the sink as I slumped down, with the trip immensity roaring at the doors bursting in at all the seams, I tried to steady myself, I meditatively focused on a drop of water, empathising with it likewise clinging to the underside of the sink. I empathised my way instantly to know where every molecule, and every atom, of the water in there, had ever been, and it was a short jump from there to realise I could do that with everything. My experience is that every atom, every subatomic particle, have omnidirectional infinite sense of the entire cosmos… and this was only in the beginning seconds of the hours long trip, the ability to see behind things, to know from every perspective, everybody, all time, all times, all dimensions, all realms, all places, all interacting potentials… I cant speak to it really, only to say I remember I did experience it. Cannot take it all back with you.

    First exchange with other people after I came out of the toilet, friends had come around, one asked “how was it?”, and with it all still being fresh, the immensity of having experienced omniscience, sought to offer what I thought was the most beautiful thing of it all… I said, with all glowing reverie “I know death”. The look of horror on the poor dear’s face though. Ho ho ho.

    But yeah, get that… we mere mortals, many, all around, can experience omniscience.

    And many are, and ever have. Say hi.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    what i’m scared of is not getting to experience things, the fact that i missed out on history isn’t much better but at least that was rather difficult to do anything about…

    it’s like finding an amazing book and thinking about when you’ll have read it all, it just fucking sucks

    • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Living in recent times, there’s a lot of historic events happening I’d rather not be around for. Just wait until the climate collapse stops playing around with foreshadowing and the dildo of consequences arrives

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because now I know what I’d be missing.

    Times like that, we experience it in one direction only

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you so sure about this? Believing there is no reincarnation is just a religious dogma of Christianity or rather all abrahamitic religions and therefore deeply engraved in our culture so we don’t even consider other possibilities. Similar to how in buddhist and hinduistic cultures reincarnation is the default way of imagining life before birth and after death.

      • Alfons@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So where do the „extra“ humans come from in these religions? What I mean is the increasing number of people being alive at the same time.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Believing there is no reincarnation is just a religious dogma of Christianity

        No, it is pretty much the default position until you can prove that it happens.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

          Especially if declining to look.

        • saimen@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same as with God? I don’t think so. Don’t you think there are things that cannot be proven or disproven? My point is the default position depends on the cultural background.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Believing there is no reincarnation is just a religious dogma of Christianity

        I don’t know that that’s true.

        We as a society don’t know what happens when we die, conscious-wise. To state “we definitely do come back” or “we definitely don’t” would be incorrect, just like saying “there’s definitely aliens” vs “there definitely are not”.

        However, we can use evidence we’ve gathered over thousands of years of existence and make assumptions. Unless I’m mistaken, there’s little evidence that has been accepted by the scientific community (Western or Eastern) to support reincarnation, so to say that “we don’t come back” is a Christian dogma is a little unfair.

        To be clear I don’t have a strong opinion on reincarnation. I’ve heard compelling stories that are hard to explain otherwise, but I feel like we’d have been able to gather at least some concrete data on it over the span of our existence.

        • fakir@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brother, you and I are the universe recycled / reincarnated over and over again living life one day at a time like a real metaverse. This consciousness is a dream, although we can’t tell because we’re inside the dream. Unlike the dreams in our sleep, biting this finger hurts for real, but real is a thing you perceive just like how we perceive money to be real in an engaging game of Monopoly.

          • IntriguedIceberg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is the way. Life can only be recognized as such in the context where an absence of life is also present, but ultimately both (life and no-life) are just interpretations of what we call existence.

        • saimen@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s exactly my point. What’s the concrete data against reincarnation would someone from a buddhist culture ask (probably even when they aren’t religious). I am just saying what we accept as default and for what we demand evidence depends on the cultural background.

          I might have formulated it exxagerated. But believing in “YOLO” is as evidence based as believing in reincarnation.

          Similar as atheism is a belief as well: believing that there is no god. How do they know? It seems my point of view is more agnostic than most here.

          • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Words like “atheism” or “agnostic” make sense as shorthands for everyday conversations or labelling, but if you want to be rigorous about it, it makes more sense to use 4 categories:

            • Gnostic theist: I know there’s a God, I’ve met Him, I feel it, I have faith, etc.

            • Agnostic theist: I don’t know if there’s a god or not, but I prefer to believe there’s one

            • Agnostic atheist: if we don’t know if there’s a god or not, there’s no reason to believe there’s one. Do you assume there’s an invisible giant teapot orbiting Earth because there’s no proof to the contrary?

            • Gnostic atheist: a god can’t possibly exist, the concept of a god is illogical, etc.

            I’m agnostic atheist, but maybe there could a firm reasoning for the gnostic atheist position. I don’t know, I would have to read and think about it more.

            • saimen@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Interesting categories, but I don’t find myself in any of them: We don’t know if there is a god therefore I neither believe in its existence nor in its non-existence because it doesn’t matter anyway. If god(s) exist they either don’t affect human lives or they do it without letting us know how and why. In both cases there is no reasons to change anything in my life.

              I think this view is called apathetic or pragmatic agnosticism.

              • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know, that seems very similar to agnostic atheism to me. Is there any situation where you would act differently if you’d consider yourself agnostic atheist instead of apathetic agnostic?

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe in a soul. That is definitely not religious dogma.

        The idea that reincarnation is the default and one would have to be indoctrinated against it is… I would say, a very interesting position to take, if I’m being polite.

  • tan00k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can’t “experience” nothingness. Even if you could, you can fear things you’ve experienced before…

  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The previous billions of years of void was a grandiose buildup to the world’s largest nothing-burger, followed by an eternity of void again.

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My current self wants to look at more cute bees and sniff more sunflowers. It doesn’t matter if my future self wouldn’t care (on account of not existing), my current self still really wants to do more of that.

  • It’s not the death part that scares me. It’s the transition between living and dead that’s going to suck.

    But then I had a really terrible November 2024 and am still suffering a high-suicidality psychotic break, so my opinion might be biased.

  • ☭SaltyIcetea☭ @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because, now that i aquired conciusness, i dont want to lose it. i dont want to re experience nothingness. ffs id rather suffer for eternity than not live at all.

    if religion wasnt so unbelievable id probably be religious. but alas i just have to hope that i am wrong in my understanding that there is no afterlife