“This is getting ridiculous and I’m about to just toss the whole thing and move back to Google,” one Redditor said of the “full-volume” ads for Alexa+ on their Echo Show.

Oh sweet summer child, Google is NOT going to be any better at this. That will just be changing one corporate evil for another.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Advertising is a small part of the experience”.

    Well great Amazon. Nobody is asking for this ‘experience’.

    • Master167@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bought the thing. I should control want it shows at all times. The reason I can’t trust the company to futz with that is why I don’t have one.

  • Bobgrayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m now reading Helen Philips’ Hum and it feels so disturbing that the dystopian world depicted in the book is so real. Like all of those things actually exist already, we just don’t think about them too often.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My pet pony keeps shitting on the floor.

    I am very frustrated and did not expect it.

    I should sell it off and buy a horse instead.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ponies are supposed to shit. It’s more like if the pony came strapped with ill-fitting saddlebags that leak toxic chemicals.

      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. It’s more as if you had to pay for the pony to get it, and then:

        If you want to ride the pony, that’s $2. The saddle has a coin slot to pay. It also has spikes poking both you and the pony if you don’t pay. Any time you get off, the spikes relock, requiring another payment to unlock.

        This is the exact same situation minus the animal cruelty part and with money being swapped with time.

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that was kinda my point :) A cloud controlled device from a tech giant is supposed to shit on the floor start doing ads and invade your privacy. It’s what they do. Like ponies pooping, you should expect it on purchase.

  • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Morons buying moronic ‘smart’ devices, unable to understand that they’re the product, not the consumer and they have sold away the rights to their eyes and ears with their purchases.

    My house contains no smart devices that can harvest data from me (my mum does use a samsung smart TV from 2016) and all devices have everything disabled and other things installed to block data collection and tracking… I can’t stop 100% of it, but what little trickle they do get is basically worthless.

    My eyes and ears are not for sale, nor is my privacy.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, you are soo cool and unique to realize that the consumer is not the customer, noone has ever figured out that before!

      No one asked about the status of smart home devices in your home.

      • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow you are so cool and unique to comment on an opinion.
        No one asked your opinion on people’s opinions.
        At least their comment wasn’t a waste of time and now I’m wasting more time.

      • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People will go to great lengths to excuse and justify their own idiocy, rather than suffer the simple acceptance they they could have been wrong… and one of these idiots suggested it was me who had ‘hubris’ :)

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there is a trickle, you do not know what you’re doing.

      This whole comment has a, “I am very badass” vibe to it.

      You’re probably sending more data to the cloud than most because of the hubris.

    • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you see the research about how they were able to use the vibrations from your laser mouse to accurately determine what was being said out loud? Or how they can map rooms and detect motion with wifi. Enforable and painfully punished laws must be written not consuming one brand is not enough.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      AND not even being paid for doing so. But paying for instead. that’s the most bizarre part of it.

      • U7826391786239@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        it doesn’t take much critical thinking to conclude that smart tvs are bullshit, but apparently too much for most people

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even worse than not-really-understanding-any-of-it is the wilful ignorance shown by some. “I have nothing to hide” is the epitome of obedient worker-ant stupidity.

            • lightnegative@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you going to do, send them money? That information isn’t private, people have to give it up all the time to receive money…

              • BarbedDentalFloss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s from the ancient banking system designed in the 1940s that is still lurching around. The protection on a check isn’t cryptographic - it relies on the issuing bank to confirm the authenticity by examining heuristics on the paper check like paper type, ink and font used, check number, issuing address and the person’s signature. It used to be that you would deposit a check at your bank and then it would be mailed to the issuing bank to be cleared for transfer. You wouldn’t just deposit it and get your money instantly, it would take up to 10 days.

                Honestly it is bewildering to me that they haven’t changed the system to issue cryptographically secure deposit-only numbers and unique withdrawal numbers that at least verify the authenticity of the check itself.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the case of smart tv’s it’s obvious why it works. It’s way cheaper to buy a smart tv vs a dumb tv now, and It’s all companies make for consumer side, which only leaves business grade TV’s/advertisement boards which cost more. Even if this isn’t the case though, with how streaming oriented most people are, the general public won’t buy a dumb tv because they would still need to buy some sort of device to allow them to access their stuff. It’s just convenient to have it in the same device rather than buy a tv then spend another $25+ on a device that can allow access to streaming, when one device can do it all.

          I upgraded to a “decent” Smart TV for my den (my previous one was an early stage Phillips smart TV that the store was basically deprecated on), and it converted 3 devices I had for my dumb tv, into that one device. It’s just convenient.

          I personally think that people should be focusing more on not buying slop-ware, and working on implementing legislation of what companies are allowed to do to consumer purchased products before trying to revert back to dumb tv’s and spending 3x as much. The future is going to happen regardless, and people are going to take the easy way out, the easier way is going to be preventing the annoyances from being allowed in the first place.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d far rather have a dumb TV/monitor and a cheap, easily upgradable smart device connected to it, but I’m on Lemmy so that shouldn’t come as a surprise.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still have the first Google Home speaker I got for free via Spotify subscription years ago, and it’s as far as I went, wouldn’t have put money on this

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haha. Are people even supprised? I mean come on.

    The best thing you can do, is just DIY your own display with a microcontroller and have some fun in building it. Maybe run Linux on it and voila.

    • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While we still have that option… I’d bet money that the second when most people start deciding to DIY their own home tech, they’ll lobby these techs as unsafe and dangerous and potentially ban their use outright, or require special licenses and degrees.

      • downvote_hunter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool, I have a degree and multiple technology certifications. Happy to help people with tech that pulls them out of oligarchs fiefdoms.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whatever accelerates us getting off our asses and seizing the means of production quicker, I’m all for it. Take the TVs, I fucking dare ya

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’ll lobby these techs as unsafe and dangerous and potentially ban their use outright, or require special licenses and degrees.

        They have a strong foundation in the DRM built into HDMI. I suspect this is exactly the real reason it is there.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          F*K the HDMI forum. Those people are the cause I can not run 4k 120Hz TV on HTPC using AMD video kernel drivers on Linux. Because these drivers are open-source and the HDMI folks do not want this support in the open source drivers… FK them hard.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google is NOT going to be any better at this

    What are you talking about? Google Home devices have been out for like a decade at this point, they don’t play ads on them.

    • donalonzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      …that you know about.

      They get more valuable information about you through their devices and show you ads elsewhere.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t play ads on Google home/nest devices like this says Amazon do.

        I would know if my Google home hubs played ads on them.

    • h54@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yet. Google is an ad company that pushes ads nearly everywhere else. Shareholders/Wall St. demand infinitely increasing year over year profitability. It’s only a matter of time.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Alexa division is struggling so they are well into the extract phase of the product.

        Google will get there in time as well.

  • FauxFax@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m about to just toss the whole thing and move back to google.

    … Ah yes. Here we see that, while frustrated, the consumer remains largely undeterred from fitting into the boxes outlined by our fearless corpo overlords.

    • other_cat@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I gave Amazon my money and I’m mad, so I’m going to give even more money to another billionaire corp.”

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is structurally just super reddit. It just hasn’t been flooded by children yet so the discourse is still college level.

        UI is too difficult for iPad babies but as the apps catch up the dumbass summer children will flood here too.

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made the mistake buying a Kindle Fire in 2015. A few months in, it was literal garbage. Everything lagged. Very few apps would work. Not much variety in the Amazon app store. Learned my lesson about Amazon products.