• Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hey that’s me! I actually specifically bought a 2019 kia because it has less digital controls than the 2021 they had for the same price.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh, yes! I was thinking why someone would do that, but cars are a very good example. I wouldn’t want a smart car that can’t drive without an internet connection, or an android tv that pushes ads on every menu option. I choose the “dumb tech”

      • pfr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Im not kidding one bit when I say, “We need open source Vehicle & Engine Manage System software and hardware!”

        I want to be able to flash my Car’s ECU with custom FOSS software. Yes, you can already replace the ECU with custom tuneing opetions that cost an arm and a leg. I want there to be Open Source Software and Hardware for consumer vehicles!

  • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sounds like nice people. Cant fault them for it, tech has gone down the drain over the years and newer stuff isn’t really worth the cost anymore.
    Are they recruiting?

    Though why specifically 2021? What exactly happened at that specific year?

        • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Chat” is ChatGPT and “pop off” is popular or gaining traction.

          I promise I’m old, I’m just going back to university and am surrounded by children lol

          Doing HW is why my response lagged, my bad.

            • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The kids today will ask a sort of rhetorical questions out loud and say something like, “chat, should I (under whatever nonsense here)”. In this instance, they’re pretending to be streamers and ask the viewers. But if someone says, “I’ll just ask chat to write my paper (or whathaveyou).” That’s ChatGPT. The difference is contextual.

              • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s good to know. Thank you. Yeah context can change a lot, but not even knowing the context can make it rather hard to guess any meaning.

                • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Normally I’d say you can ignore it because it’ll change soon enough, but I think “ask chat” will become synonymous with “ask ai” similar to how “Google it” is now considered personal research/look it up.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, ‘chat’ is Internet Chat, as it’s been known for 30 years when it moved from academia to mainstream.

          ‘Pop off’ is just this year’s slang for “rapidly gain popularity”, and it’ll be replaced by something equally ephemeral (like with ‘fetch’, ‘fleek’, some level of ‘rizz’ or ‘cap’) soon.

          • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thank you, but that still doesn’t really explain why 2021. Chatting services we’re popular way before that. Something must have happened in the year 2021 in relation to technology so that this specific year was chosen as last decent production year for technology.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I saw a comment somewhere else on Lemmy saying they heard someone refer to asking chatgpt something as “asking chat.” So I think it was a meta reference to calling AI chat.

              And yes, since chatgpt was released in 2022 my cutoff for searches is also 2021, so it makes perfect sense to me.

            • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              This might be my “woosh” moment. But I’ll bite.

              I think they were referring to ChatGPT being let loose on the general public. That kinda marked the start for the current AI bubble and the enshittification of every new tech product with some sort of LLM bullshit.

              • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                No, I’m genuinely curious why such an odd number, like 2020 would make more sense as it’s the beginning of a decade.

                ChatGPT was released late 2022. So it cant be that one either. Maybe some other AI chat service was released around 2021?

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Everything modern also says you don’t own it, only lease access that can be revoked at any time, and also serves you tons of ads while listening to and spying on everything you do.

      But anytime anyone says anything unkind towards the god of technology, they are amish, luddites, fools, etc.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Luddites got a bad rap. They weren’t anti-technology. They just knew that the technology was being used to push their wages down and make their hours longer.

    Ned Ludd knew that smashing the machines was sometimes the best option!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, after I learned about his movement, I stopped using the term as a pejorative. They were’ pretty based.

      A lot of the machinery was also dangerous AF.

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not going digital Amish, but I’m trying my best not to let tech oligarchs hoard wealth that they can use to pursue their take on techno feudalism.

    Most things could be nice if they were done environment consciously with something else than profit-oriented data harvesting in mind: social networks, LLMs, even smart glasses.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think that it’s not that people refuse to use new tech, I think it’s more that most of what is coming out is just worse in terms of usability and functionality in a lot of ways. Not so much a rejection of innovation, but a rejection of the priorities that major industry players have decided on. Like, “improvement” is relative, and what people care about isn’t being improved or actively being regressed.

    They’re making bad products, and people don’t want them.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I am so overwhelmed by the visual clutter of Win 11 and the bizarre choices MS made. It’s like every time I want to do something fairly basic I have to relearn everything.

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      100% confirm.

      I’m driving a rented car for work this week. It’s a 2025 Chevy Traverse. Not a single engineer was involved in making this car. It’s one of the worst cars I think I’ve ever driven.

      The gear shift is on the steering wheel where the windshield wiper control arm would be normally.

      Shifting requires pulling in that bar and then moving it up or down. To put it in Park, you press a button on the tip of it.

      The parking break is also a button. But it doesn’t work unless the car engine is on. The car engine turns on by also pushing a button.

      Windshield wipers? Button press. Windshield wipers plus cleaning fluid? Same button, but press it harder.

      You want to adjust the treble or bass of the music you’re listening to? You can ONLY do that when the Radio is on. Then turn it off. Then switch to Spotify, etc for added Bass.

      Near collision detection? It’s got the normal lights that light up. But it ALSO has a rumble pack in the driver’s chair that vibrates the left or right side of your balls if something is near that side of the car. How near? Someone walking by it on the sidewalk triggered it when I was at a stop sign, and literally jostled my nuts for 20 seconds.

      This car literally sexually assaults you during near collisions.

      Which I guess might be great if you’re suicidal and want to nut while almost dying.

  • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    people are saying its because of AI, but its actually because they refuse to get any information regarding technoblades death

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think you meant to say “people are saying it’s because of slop” - no sane person that I know refusing to work with this shit is dumb enough to call it “AI”

      • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        slop is often used to refer to things that were not made using generative AI

        but yeah, AI is the wrong term

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Fair enough, I only started reading the term when it was used to express disdain for machine learning systems being wrongly marketed as “AI”

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I sometimes use just the quotes for brevity, but I mostly use “slop”. I hate the implicit suggestion there’s any kind of intelligence/understanding involved in generating the output. That combined with the admittedly impressive looking/sounding results leads people to believe it’s actually accurate & reliable, which it isn’t.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only technology developed after 2021 was LLM’s and Stable Diffusion

    This is the understanding of a “tech enthusiast”, not someone who’s actually interested in how computers work.