• moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      If you’re not accelerating towards the destruction of the system, then how are you destroying it?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        That’s… not what that word means. Seriously look it up on Wikipedia. The short of it is that accelerationism refers to the idea that actively pushing society towards some kind of failure state faster will result in radical change once the dust clears, making it a good choice if you want to get radical change faster. For example this could be a leftist voting for Trump so fascism comes about, fucks things up and opens up the way for a socialist revolution. For obvious reasons this isn’t a very popular idea, but it’s also quite clearly not what the parent comment said. There are other ways to do anti-electoralism that don’t involve pushing the fascists towards power.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah, and I’m asking him what his other way is to do anti-electoralism. If it’s not accelerationism, what is it? Don’t worry; I already know the answer.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            And why do you think you know the answer? History is full of examples of people effecting change outside the ballot box without accelerationism; in fact that’s probably how most of your rights came about.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Nothing new about it, but whatever you need to tell yourself to allow yourself to completely ignore it, I guess.