• Kraiden@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    There’s a real economic cost to [blah blah crybaby way of saying AI disclosures]

    Yes. There is. Because informed consumers vote with their wallets. As it should be. Moron.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      At this point he has whined about it so much that everyone’s going to know the game uses AI, even if they don’t disclose it. He would have genuinely being better off shutting up about it.

    • BillionaireStew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I notice slopcoders often maintain that “slop code is just as good as code written by humans- in fact it is better!” while also refusing to clearly label their output as slop.

    • Aeder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The Epic Store has always been anti-consumer so it’s no surprise he defends that kind of practice.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m not sure what your point is because Steam is absolutely flooded with porn games, especially since the rise of genAI.

            • iamthetot@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Really? They’re all over my Steam front page. And I’ve never bought a single one.

              Do you have adult games toggled off in Steam settings? That may be why you never see them.

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It gives consumers free games and takes a smaller cut from the developers than steam. All corporations have mutually exclusive interests with the consumer tho.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          They do that to try to gain marketshare. They should try to just stop being shitty instead and improve their client. And get off Xitter.

          • Corn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            They do that to try to gain marketshare.

            This is every single action any entity which exists to extract profit from you that isn’t immediately increasing revenue or decreasing expenses/wages.

            They should try to just stop being shitty

            Once again, this is done to gain marketshare

            It’s weird as fuck to see people with loyalty to one corporation or another.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Sue. My point is they’re not doing it out of the good of their heart. They’re doing it in lieu of actually making it a good platform to buy from.

              • Corn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                No corporation has ever done anything out of the good of its heart because they do not have hearts, you are still treating them like people instead of entities that exist exclusively to extract money from you while giving as little money to its workers as possible.

                They’re doing it in lieu of actually making it a good platform to buy from.

                Nah, giving the workers more money and me free games does more to make a platform viable than features. But doing shit everyone hates like filling your store with slop games that can’t be identified until you’ve already paid is a dumb decision.

                • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  You’re an idiot that only cares about getting free stuff. You are arguing against people having “loyalty to one corporation or another” while endlessly defending the objectively worse company simply because you like to get free games…

        • endbringer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          It gives consumers free games

          Wow, amazing. Nevermind that most those giveaways are on sales for peanuts anyway. And you get them on garbage launcher.

          and takes a smaller cut from the developers than steam.

          Great, they take smaller cut. At a low, low cost of being a black hole of exposure. But hey! They do take a smaller cut from the two copies you do sell.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          So do developers on Steam, you literally have a filter for free games. While also having user reviews, forums, a sane refund policy, regional pricing, curators, funding Linux driver development, as well as a shopping cart (though I heard Epic Store finally put enough braincells together to get that one too).

  • narot23@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Epic is tripling down with AI features in the next Unreal Engine - it makes sense that he wants to do away with the disclosures. It’s not the dumbest business play ever, I’m pretty confident it will help further cement Unreal Engine as the “go-to” for games development (I’m not happy about it though). Don’t like the guy, haven’t since they dumped UT for Fortnite, almost nothing good has come from the success of that game.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t know. “Made with Unreal Engine” is starting to be seen as a bad thing by players too, objectively or not…

      At some point that’ll have to become a consideration when choosing an engine. Maybe using UE will end up meaning too many lost sales, like using obvious “AI” generated assets.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        a couple months ago I was bitching (just to myself, not online) about all the shit I hate in modern games, when I noticed a lot of what i was bitching about was the same shit in different games.

        and then i did some poking around, and found they were all UE5 games, and I hated the same shit in all those games because its the same UE5 shit thats in every game. games looking like shit because they want to use whatever quasi-software raytracy thing that UE5 has, and to make it work they force you into using resolution scaling.

        I play at 1080p. I shouldnt have to use resolution scaling. In fact, I actively turn it off in every non-UE5 engine’d game… because they all run gloriously at max settings. UE5 games force on so much bullshit that it has to render at a lower resultion, on medium settings, just to get a playable frame rate at 1080. and the games look like smeared shit because of it.

        Its literally to the point now that, no matter how much I might want a game, if it has UE, I’m not buying it.

      • narot23@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        One can hope. I think with 5 and it’s poor optimization in most cases it took a big reputation hit, but I think it also must be such a good deal that it enticed a lot of developers to use it. Hell, AFAIK, the next Witcher games are going to be UE-based. Things like the traversal stutter amongst other long-standing issues sure did some reputational damage, but does that mean studios will actually care when they’re getting such a good cut to use the engine (over others)?

  • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    He calls it an “anti-technology smear campaign”, and claims that it’s akin to Valve forcing developers to list their political affiliation, i.e. whether they vote Republican or Democrat

    Billionaires and false equivalencies, name a more iconic duo

    I mean, if we’re going to compare apples and oranges, how about with a metaphor that makes sense? Like how if you sell food you have to list the ingredients used

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Does everyone remember how Steam banned NFT games and Epic allowed them and how that absolutely catapulted them into success over their competitor? … no?

    OK, well, but maybe this time?

  • False@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t care if a game is made with AI as long as it’s good. I also don’t care if there’s a disclosure so others can make their own decision. Tim is an idiot.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    The article states that the AI that is disclosed in steam is about art/voice made by ai that makes it into the final release(stuff that’s easy to notice). Vibe coding does not need to be disclosed.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    AI disclosures are the compromise. If they’re not contempt with the compromise, then AI may as well be gone from art creation.