• billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I really really like AOC, I wonder if the rest of America isn’t ready to elect a woman. We’ve had two female candidates and both times we got Trump. Granted the first time was Hillary and I held my nose to vote for her (now I’d vote for a fresh dog turd before I’d vote Trump, but something about the whole Hillary thing just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with what happened to Bernie), and the second time they really screwed up at the last minute with Joe. I guess I’m just skittish at this point.

    I really hope I’m wrong, because AOC is just a hair behind Bernie in my opinion and I love Bernie. I think she’d be a really intelligent take no shit leader and I am so desperate for that right now.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both candidates ran as conservatives that attacked the left side of the Democratic party more than they did Trump’s policies. It’s not because they were women, it’s the policies they stood for.

    • blandfordforever@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally believe that a woman could make a great president. I also believe that America is much more sexist and racist than many of us would like to admit.

  • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Harris was a leader she would be out there touring like AOC. Shes not a leader. She had her shot to prove otherwise and didn’t.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If she were out there touring people would tell her to shut up and sit down. She had her shot, twice, nobody wants what she’s selling.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t imagine thinking about “serving people” when majority of them turned out to be hateful idiot that frankly deserved getting their faces eaten by a leopard. Let her catch a break maybe?

      • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Dipshit didn’t even get the majority of people who did vote, let alone the country as a whole

      • piefood@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I’m not giving her a break. She handed the elction to Trump on a silver platter. It should have been a slam dunk election, but she chose genocide, money, and the Cheney’s over winning.

    • Like when she was up there giving her chatgpt, “make me sound inspirational” concession speech rather than just being mad as hell like the rest of us. She’s plays leader but she will sit in the manager cubical while the rest of us eat the company provided cold turkey in the break room the day before Thanksgiving.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, if I were her I’d feel drained and devastated. Everything that happened during the election and people still picked Trump over her…

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a hard time feeling sorry for her after leaving the left hanging and going after conservative votes. She made an incredibly poor strategic choice and it cost all of us.

        Obviously she’s not the only one to blame here, conservatives deserving the majority of blame followed by people that stayed home, but she doesn’t deserve pity.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pity maybe not, but understanding definitely. If that were me ya’ll picked Trump over I’d tell all ya’ll to fuck right off while I prep a boat to Europe. Then all the people saying I should stay out of it would be bitching that I’m not participating anymore.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. If I were her, I’d fuck off to Europe and send a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help.

            Is that in the best interests of the American people? No. Is it an entirely understandable reaction? Yes.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I were her, I’d fuck off to Europe and send a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help.

              Sending a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help was basically her campaign.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            A recount requires a vote to be close, it wasn’t. Trump won every swing state. And with the margins he won by, every recount in the world would not overcome the 86 EVs she trailed by.

            • aceshigh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The election results were very close - and it was a big election, some ballots were rejected, there were bomb threats and there were also statistical anomalies. She should have asked for a recount.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I have a lot of problems with Kamala The Cop. But she lost what might be the final election in American History. That takes a lot out of you

      • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Drained and devastated but willing to lose again? Spray this turd down the drain of your empathy and out of a leadership roll.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly why she’s not a leader. A leader understand that you don’t have time to lick you wounds when the enemy is at your door. She should be fighting harder now, not sulking.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If she’s still drained and devastated months after losing, she’s not emotionally mature enough to be president. What’s going to happen the first time a soldier gets killed in combat? At least Hillary has some cajones, Harris never gave me that impression.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least Hillary has some cajones, Harris never gave me that impression.

          Hillary had years of experience on the federal level. Senator and then Head of State. She was used to making choices that had a big impact.

          I will always remember Harris for her DNC nomination debate performance. She personally called out Biden’s racist policies and how it impacted her. Showing that out of touch white men have lasting impacts on generations children. It was her highest moment. If you check articles they’ll say that was one of the highlights of the event.

          And then became Biden’s VP. Just willing to ignore how he personally wrote a racist bill that harmed you because it’s a position of power? Alright. That’s sure a message about your morals.

          And when asked about why by Steven Colbert: “It was a debate!”

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I were her, I would have had a plan B knowing what the right wingers were up to, and it should have looked a lot like what Bernie and AOC are doing. Instead she showed up then fucked off to somewhere else after hanging out with Dick Cheney for a few months.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They cheated, and we ALL know it. If she’s upset about anything, it’s that she was cheated out of her historic legacy, and the spineless Democratic party backed HitlerPig over her.

    • dota__2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the fact you people are still demanding she dance for you after vehemently screaming she’s worse than the current state of affairs is wild.

      your purity tests are trash.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usual: If you voted 3rd party or didn’t vote, you signed off on our current reality.

      But you’re not wrong, and I have plenty to disagree with AOC about, but they’re all conversations for a better time; done and done.

      • Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, 3rd party voters at least voted. This solely lies on the folks who didn’t vote.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you voted 3rd party in a FPTP election, you are functionally indistinguishable from a non-voter. You can talk about your principles all you want, but by the mechanics of the electoral system you are exactly equivalent to a non-voter.

          • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly the opposite of reality. FPTP does not preclude third parties from winning, hence the existence of the republican party. It does mean you have to vote your principles and not strategically vote. If everyone voted for the party that most closely aligned with their principles, neither the Dems or repubs would ever wing the presidency and would never hold a majority in any Congress at any level.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Incorrect. I can justify any number of results with such a monumental “if”. Any strategy based on such a large number of people suddenly changing their voting tendency in such a way is unworkable. As one party splinters, the other is heavily incentivized to stay together and easily win. It’s a game of chicken; the first party to break ranks is doomed. People understand this on an intuitive, tribalistic level. Fracturing the less monolithic party will only strengthen the more monolithic one. That is reality.

              Without organization sufficient to convince at least a third of the country that a specific party is viable, you cannot beat a strategic party with principles alone.

              • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hard disagree, as again, the republican party exists. It was a third party.

                Practically no one votes strategically. The vast majority of voters vote the same as their parents and/or peers. The extreme minority of voters that care about issues vote for whatever party of the two that suits them best at the time.

                But bigger than all these groups are the eligible voters that think nothing will change because people like you tell them they only have two options, so they don’t vote.

                Because neither option is good. There is Nazi, and there is the group that appoints nazis. Both exist solely for their own power and wealth. Neither help people until the riots get too violent. So why vote. Why care?

                So either we introduce a third party or more, and maybe give some hope, or we let the uniparty continue to win and we all have to survive a balkanized US when it collapses.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Without organization sufficient to convince at least a third of the country that a specific party is viable, you cannot beat a strategic party with principles alone.

          • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah fuck people who help dems win local elections and ballot measures! Those things aren’t real! Everyone knows the house and senate don’t matter! And neither do state legislatures! Fuck those stupid things that don’t affect anyone, it’s all about voting for the guy you think is going to win, not the one you want! Or, idk whatever you dems go on about.

            Let’s keep attacking progressive voter base like the DNC wants! Let’s keep alienating them more! It will be a good idea THIS time! It worked so well that’s why 2016 was our best year! Way better than 2008 when we didn’t actively attack them! If we don’t ensure politics is voting against the one you hate most how will we keep all those non-voters at home, keep money in politics, and keep those oligarchs happy!

      • piefood@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope. I voted 3rd party because I didn’t want Trump, and I also didn’t want Harris. Maybe if Harris had tried campaining on what Americans wanted, rather than trying to win over people who were obviously not going to vote for her, we wouldn’t be here.

        But she chose genocide, money, and the Cheneys over winning an election against one of the least popular presidents we’ve ever had.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Completely agree. It would have demonstrated that she would have been a good president and it would have sealed the deal for her (if there are legit elections). She didn’t step up. AOC did. Says a lot about each of them.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is that shocking because she is as high as second or not higher?

    TBH that sounds completely expected to me. Bernie Sanders never won the DNC primary, idk why anybody would think AOC would unless a major upset happened.

      • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Truthfully I don’t know if the Democrats have anyone that can win back the American people. Newsome is hated by half his own state and all the other states. Buttigieg maybe? Idk.

        We really need another Obama or Bill Clinton. Someone charasmatic and well spoken. We just don’t have anyone young or charasmatic in that way that I can think of.

      • UsernameHere@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But would the majority of American voters vote for her?

        Because if not then it doesn’t matter how great she would be.

      • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        She’s hit and miss for me. When she’s calling people out on their bullshit regardless of party affiliation I am a fan. When she’s marching along with the ancient Democrats and being performative I can’t stand that shit.

        I do not think she would do significantly better than Harris did. I think she would be an improvement, but idk if that’s gonna be enough.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of all the US presidents, only Obama, Harding, and FDR won the presidency from the Senate. I dont see that being in the Senate or not being in the Senate has any bearing at all beyond a bump for name recognition, and AOC doesnt need that bump. Especially so with the voters extreme low polling for approval of dems in congress.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t mean as a step towards POTUS. I think we need more people like her in Congressional leadership roles more than we need her as POTUS. Unless we’re talking about the next Roosevelt, I want a boring POTUS.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m GLAD that Democrats LEARNED from their Past Elections and are running a KNOWN LOSER WHO COULDNT BEAT A LITERAL FASCIST who Ran on the Platform of Ruining Our Lives! It pairs VERY WELL with Chuck Schumer’s Policy of doing NOTHING while American Citizens are Deported to El Salvadorian DEATH CAMPS!

  • mystik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only a shock to folks who still think Democrat centerists are what’s gonna win the votes

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Needs a little Asterisk* next to centrist and a footnote

      *still way further left than any Republican

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because no matter who is in office they’re still part of the enrichment scheme that is our government. They don’t really care who wins or loses because it doesn’t really affect them.
          That’s why it’s important to be represented by the marginalized so that the decisions actually matter to the people making them.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        She ran on exactly the same thing as Biden and backtracked on everything progressive she said in previous campaigns.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will vote for AOC with pride. But I’m leery about running another woman right now. Neither Hillary nor Kamala could win against Trump.

      That said, I can’t think of anyone I’d be happier to vote for. I dream of her being President. I don’t know if swing states will have it, but I would fight to make it so.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hillary and Kamala were awful candidates - they wouldn’t have won if they were men or if it were the first coming of Christ. (I’m skeptical he ever arrived at all). The DNC is the blame for their failure. Hillary was out of touch. Kamala had too many issues to list.

        All that aside, they would have presidented circles around Trump.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. There’s no statistical difference in the chances of victory between men and women when running for political office. Lots of Republican politicians are women. I don’t see it as a big deal.

        Also, lots of open racists voted for Obama. If you look at the polling and the interviews, it was much more about running conservative Democrats trying to get the votes of people who wanted to shake things up. That’s what Obama promised, that’s why Sanders would’ve won, by some measures, and it seems AOC is out there generating the same buzz.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no statistical difference in the chances of victory between men and women when running for political office. Lots of Republican politicians are women. I don’t see it as a big deal.

          It’s only a deal because the democratic party is willing to hold back all women just to prevent the success of one progressive woman.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will vote for AOC with pride. But I’m leery about running another woman right now.

        …that we’re talking about a progressive woman.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a huge AOC supporter, but she should wait a 2 or 3 cycles (if there are any cycles anymore). I’d rather see her take Schumer’s senate seat, and serve there for a term or two first, and succeed Bernie as the Senate’s progressive leader.

  • bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    geeez, I wish it was 2028 already! I hope we still have elections in 2028. I usually don’t like to be doomer, but nobody is really stopping trump’s dictatorship right now. 😬

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are elections this year if we make it to November. The “muzzle velocity” they got going isn’t giving me hope but the protests and town halls do a little.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we give up, you are right, there won’t be any.

      But we also can’t just wait and think everything will be fine by next election.

      The current administration wants us to be a dictatorship. When they talk about third term, they wants us to hey used to the fact that he will stay in power until his death.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Elections are far too useful as a form of control for the state to dispense with them. Virtually every country on earth has elections, even if they’re just sham elections for show. If you’re a dictator or aspiring dictator, you’re generally much better off having some pretence of democratic legitimacy than just coming out and announcing yourself as president for life.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So far the regime has done a ton of things that hurt its own legitimacy for basically no reason, from defunding USAid to dismantling DEI programs to destroying the administrative state for a the sake of pennies in savings. Those are all extremely useful to the government, just like elections, but they’re evil-liberal-deep-state-woke whatever and so they have to be stopped.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      itt: we are completely fucked and this might be the end of america… but i ain’t voting for her! she better personally bless every toilet as transgender compatible and become a member of hamas before i vote for her!

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t give into the doom that Trump & Musk want us to have. They want us thinking we’ve already lost so we don’t try to stop them, but the fight ain’t over till it’s over. We the people have power if we’re willing to use it

      Join on the streets, take a part in boycotts, join strikes, etc.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Join on the streets, take a part in boycotts, join strikes, etc.

        I agree, but those things aren’t voting.

        Voting is over. It’s time to do something else.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is only “doom and gloom” if you’ve given up and resigned yourself to inaction.

        IMO, the worst possible response is ignoring reality and entertaining the fantasy that an election 3.5 years away could overthrow a fascist dictatorship that is doing everything you would do if you never planned on facing accountability, justice, or (fair) elections ever again.

        IMO, the worst possible response is believing elections or bi-monthly protests are the only plausible way to remove a fascist dictatorship. There are many options, and Americans are already at the point that warrants a permanent general-strike. The corruption, authoritarianism, and treason to their constitutional oath is on full display for all to see. There should be a million people camped around capitol hill and every single Republican politicians home and office — every single SC justice — right now, PEACEFULLY demanding their immediate resignation/abdication, and new elections.

        … and if the above fails, and the fascists resort to violence and terrorism to crush the protestors, that’s when the gloves should come off and the protestors should be prepared to forcefully remove the fascists, by any means necessary. That is literally the entire reason the 2nd amendment exists at all.

        Every tyrant in history has proven that they’re either paper tigers who collapse (usually by fleeing) under the weight of opposition (often internal)… or choose violence, and should be met with violence.