• Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    They should not be ALLOWED to wear COSTUMES! YOU SHOULD BE ON TOP OF THIS MONDOMMY

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    When are people going to learn these billionaire narcissists don’t care what we say about them, just that we talk about them.

    This post and everything about her, is what she wants you to do.

    I’m understanding when maga falls for this shit, but it’s so fucking depressing to see people on the left incapable of seeing they’re being manipulated

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    For those who don’t know:

    Edit: Either her account was scrubbed or this is fake. Normally, I don’t like to go after people like this, but just like trump, if you’re a nazi or hang with nazis, I have no problem making fun of your looks.

  • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    “Being allowed in New York”. If you lock the cosplayers up, we are going to have to lock up all the rednecks with the “Biden tied up on my trunk” vinyls on their truck bed.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Archives were shut down, so it’s hard to tell anymore. She currently has no posts. I don’t think it’s real, but the OP did a great job of making it sound like it.

  • kboos1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Then it shouldn’t have gone on national television advocating giving up our rights for privacy and installing Dump’s surveillance app.

    What did it think was going to happen? Looken like a Martian from Mar Attacks.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Fascist adjacent bridge troll mad?

    Maybe you shouldn’t have buddied up with fascists or had your face re-arranged by a blender.

    • obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I don’t know what the right move would be for someone in her situation, but I do know that whiny posts directed to the mayor of NYC is diametrically opposed to whatever the right move might be.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Someone with her wealth could put down their phone, walk away from public life, and literally hide out in a luxury resort until nobody gives a fuck anymore.

        You’d think someone would have told her that by now.

        • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          She could just work on being the best human she can be.

          No one would have criticised Dolly because she looked weird given past surgery etcetera.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Silence. Absolute silence. Is how you deal with that. On multiple levels. If she’d stay perfectly silent, we’d all have a much better time.

  • Kraiden@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Probably going to be massively down voted. Have at it.

    This comment section is fucked up. Yes she’s on the wrong side of the table and may even be a terrible person.

    But this is attacking a woman based on her appearance. Have we really learnt nothing as a society?

    • Gaslov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Why do you care if you are down voted by people who are so obviously the bad guys? This woman did a fantastic thing. She doesn’t decide who is the president.

      • Kraiden@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        WTF are you even talking about? She’s a vile person with vile beliefs. She does not deserve to be attacked for her appearance. These beliefs are not mutually exclusive.

    • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s different and here’s why. She didn’t look like that naturally. This is her engaging in cosmetic surgery to alter her appearance into … something… that is currently in vogue with a certain demographic of white house boot licking sycophants. It’s called Mar-a-lago face, and it’s done purposefully to ingratiate oneself to a certain fascist, racist, 34-count felon pedophile rapist. And if you were to drastically alter yourself to appease someone like that, well, you deserve to be mocked.

      • Kraiden@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Look, you can check my post history. I fucking hate the pedo billionaire class, but this is still not ok.

        We all choose our appearance to some extent.

        She’s chosen to alter her appearance to fit in with her chosen group, and instead of attacking her for the (admittedly despicable) views of that group, you’re choosing the easier thing to pick apart. An appearance that you don’t like because it’s associated with that group. At the very least, it’s lazy. It’s stooping to their level. It’s not ok.

        • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          This is like when Tim Walz was running for VP and called republicans “weird.” And we all got it, and understood it, and it was a popular bit of messaging that resonated with people. Because, let’s face it, they’re fucking weird.

          But then the democrats were like “oh no! but you might offend someone!” so they stopped the popular messaging that resonated with voters and didn’t use it again right before failing.

          Look, making fun of someone for their appearance isn’t the classiest thing to do, but when you’re talking about a group that’s literally worshiping at the feet of a golden altar of protecting pedophiles, you take the shots you can. And whatever hurts their feelings the most, well, I’m ok with it. We don’t always have to take the high ground. Sometimes you gotta hit’em where it hurts.

          • Kraiden@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            you take the shots you can

            No. This makes you no better than a MAGAt attacking AOC for her appearance because you’re too dim witted to make a good argument against her politics. It brings you down to the level of someone harrasing a transgender person because they don’t “pass”

            This is not the way.

            ETA: Also Tim Walz wasn’t attacking a single individual woman based solely on her appearance. He was attacking republican politics. HE was doing it right. This is NOT that.

                • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  I mean, you’re right. I should be above it. But I’m not. Fuck that ghoul of a woman. Elitist rich bitch got her face all fucked up so she could fit in with a big group of pedophile protectors. Fuck her and her weird ass face. Hope every time she looks in the mirror she’s haunted by the ghosts of pedophiles past, present, and future.

                  And again, I know I should be better than this. But I’m not. Fuck her.

        • architect@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Her weakness is out here for all of us to see and you’re like “no don’t attack that!”. She doesn’t give a fuck about how despicable her views are. She gives a fuck about her appearance. She’s an ugly cut up disgusting looking cunt and she deserves to know we feel that way about her.

          • Kraiden@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            She’s an ugly cut up disgusting looking cunt and she deserves to know we feel that way about her.

            You could be a MAGAt talking about AOC here, and it would not be out of place. I have no respect for them, and I have no respect for you. Be better.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I can’t believe I had to scroll so far for some sanity.

      It’s disturbing to me how comfortable so many people are with hate and bullying as long as it’s directed at the people they don’t like.

      Not to mention this is just another meaningless distraction away from whatever these ghouls are up to this news cycle.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Unironically: yes

          But more importantly, the people making fun of her for her looks are shitty. They’re reinforcing the unhealthy standards the media has of what women are supposed to look like, and they are portraying opposition to Trump and his allies as being mean-spirited bullies and sore losers of some silly popularity contest rather than proponents of actual causes. It encourages all of the harassment that right-wingers make against progressive women.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Ooh! Ooh! I can explain!

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

  • Denfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Is it tasteless? Yes. Why is it allowed? Because we have first amendment rights Susan— and questioning the rights of the masses just wasted any sympathy you were getting. Well, that, and the fact the Trump accounts you helped create are already getting called out for fraud.

    • bertlewirth@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Because we have first amendment rights Susan

      had*

      Now only the rich and powerful have first amendment rights in the USA.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I honestly thought it was some viral marketing for a horror movie for a while until I figured out that this eldritch horror was and actual person (allegedly).

    • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I only know this image as the ‘sleep paralysis demon’. I thought originally it was for a movie as well.